As the NFL offseason unfolds in early 2025, the Los Angeles Rams find themselves at a crossroads with their quarterback situation. Matthew Stafford, the veteran signal-caller who led the Rams to a Super Bowl victory in 2021, has been the cornerstone of the franchise’s resurgence under head coach Sean McVay. However, with Stafford’s contract negotiations stalling and rumors of a potential trade swirling, the Rams may be preparing for a future without him. Enter Jimmy Garoppolo—known affectionately as “Jimmy G”—the team’s current backup quarterback, who officially becomes a free agent in March could step into the spotlight as Stafford’s replacement. This article explores the implications, feasibility, and potential outcomes of Garoppolo taking over as the Rams’ starting quarterback, delving into his career, fit within the Rams’ system, and the broader context of the team’s roster and strategy.
Matthew Stafford’s Tenure with the Rams: A Legacy in Question
Matthew Stafford arrived in Los Angeles in 2021 via a blockbuster trade from the Detroit Lions, bringing with him a reputation as one of the league’s most talented yet underappreciated quarterbacks. His impact was immediate: in his first season with the Rams, he threw for 4,886 yards, 41 touchdowns, and 17 interceptions, culminating in a Super Bowl LVI victory over the Cincinnati Bengals. Over four seasons with the Rams, Stafford has amassed 14,700 passing yards, 95 touchdowns, and 44 interceptions, with a 34-23 record as a starter. His 2023 Pro Bowl nod and a standout 2024 postseason—where he threw for 533 yards and four touchdowns across two games—underscore his enduring elite-level play despite turning 37 in February 2025.
However, Stafford’s future with the Rams is uncertain. His current contract, a four-year, $160 million deal signed in 2022, carries a $49.6 million cap hit in 2025, with only $4 million in guaranteed money remaining. Reports indicate that Stafford and the Rams met before Super Bowl LIX to discuss a new contract, but little progress has been made. The Rams have granted Stafford’s camp permission to explore trade options, signaling that both sides are weighing their next moves. Stafford has expressed his intent to play in 2025, but the question remains: will it be in Los Angeles, or elsewhere?
If the Rams trade Stafford, they could save $27 million in cap space with a post-June 1 transaction, providing flexibility to address other needs. Yet, losing a Super Bowl-winning quarterback with gas left in the tank could jeopardize the team’s competitive window, especially with head coach Sean McVay’s offensive system tailored to Stafford’s strengths. This is where Jimmy Garoppolo emerges as a potential bridge option.
Jimmy Garoppolo’s Journey: From Backup to Starter and Back Again
Jimmy Garoppolo’s NFL career is a study in contrasts—marked by flashes of brilliance, injury setbacks, and a knack for winning despite criticism. Drafted in the second round by the New England Patriots in 2014, Garoppolo spent three-plus seasons as Tom Brady’s backup, learning Bill Belichick’s system and showing promise in limited action. In 2017, he was traded to the San Francisco 49ers, where he transformed a 1-10 team into a 6-10 squad by winning his final five starts of the season.
Garoppolo’s tenure with the 49ers solidified his reputation as a capable starter. From 2019 to 2022, he posted a 32-15 record in the regular season, with a 70-34 touchdown-to-interception ratio, a 100.2 quarterback rating, and an impressive 8.3 yards per attempt. He led San Francisco to two NFC Championship games and a Super Bowl appearance in 2019, falling just short against the Kansas City Chiefs. His 8-0 regular-season record against the Rams during this period made him a thorn in Los Angeles’ side, a fact not lost on Sean McVay, who has long admired Garoppolo’s poise and decision-making.
However, injuries—most notably a torn ACL in 2018 and recurring shoulder, foot, and knee issues—have hampered Garoppolo’s consistency. After losing his starting job to Brock Purdy in San Francisco, he signed a three-year, $72.75 million deal with the Las Vegas Raiders in 2023. That stint proved disastrous: Garoppolo went 3-3 in six starts, throwing seven touchdowns against nine interceptions and posting a pedestrian 77.7 passer rating before being benched for rookie Aidan O’Connell. Released by the Raiders in 2024, he joined the Rams on a one-year deal as Stafford’s backup, serving a two-game suspension at the season’s start for violating the NFL’s performance-enhancing substances policy.
In his lone start for the Rams in Week 18 of the 2024 season—a meaningless game with starters resting—Garoppolo completed 27 of 41 passes for 334 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception in a 30-25 loss to the Seattle Seahawks. While not a definitive showcase, it reaffirmed his ability to operate a high-level offense, particularly one similar to McVay’s scheme, which mirrors the system he thrived in under 49ers head coach Kyle Shanahan.
Why Jimmy G? The Case for Garoppolo as Stafford’s Successor
The Rams’ interest in retaining Garoppolo beyond his current one-year contract is well-documented. A recent article by Jordan Dajani of CBS Sports indicated that the Rams are comfortable with Garoppolo as a starter and expect to re-sign him this offseason. Sean McVay has praised Garoppolo’s “amiability, work ethic, and understanding of the offense,” while quarterback coach Dave Ragone has highlighted his ability to mimic game-like scenarios in practice, benefiting the team’s young defense.
Garoppolo’s statistical profile supports this confidence. His career winning percentage of .697 (43-21 as a starter) ranks fourth among quarterbacks with at least 30 starts since 2000, trailing only Patrick Mahomes, Tom Brady, and Peyton Manning. While not a statistical dynamo like Stafford, Garoppolo excels in efficiency and game management—hallmarks of McVay’s system. His quick release, accuracy on short-to-intermediate throws, and experience in play-action heavy schemes align with the Rams’ offensive identity, which relies on precise timing and a strong running game led by Kyren Williams.
Moreover, Garoppolo represents a cost-effective option. At 33 (turning 34 in November 2025), he’s unlikely to command a long-term, high-value contract, allowing the Rams to allocate resources elsewhere—perhaps to bolster a defense adjusting to life without Aaron Donald or to re-sign key free agents like safety Kamren Curl. As a bridge quarterback, Garoppolo could stabilize the position for one or two seasons while the Rams groom a successor, a strategy McVay has employed successfully with veterans like Baker Mayfield and Carson Wentz in past years.
Challenges and Limitations: Can Garoppolo Fill Stafford’s Shoes?
Despite his winning pedigree, Garoppolo is not without flaws. His injury history raises concerns about durability, a critical factor for a Rams team that has leaned on Stafford’s resilience despite his own health setbacks. Garoppolo hasn’t played a full season since 2019, and his performance has waned in recent years—his 81.4 quarterback rating and 9-10 touchdown-to-interception ratio over the last two seasons pale in comparison to Stafford’s output.
Critics also point to Garoppolo’s conservative style. Where Stafford thrives on deep throws and improvisational brilliance, Garoppolo leans heavily on his supporting cast and coaching scheme. The Rams’ receiving corps, featuring Cooper Kupp (whose own future is uncertain amid trade rumors) and Puka Nacua, thrives on Stafford’s willingness to push the ball downfield. Garoppolo’s 8.3 career yards per attempt is respectable, but his reluctance to take risks could limit the offense’s ceiling, especially in shootouts against NFC West rivals like the 49ers or Seahawks.
The postseason is another question mark. While Garoppolo has a 4-2 playoff record with the 49ers, his performances were inconsistent—most notably in Super Bowl LIV, where he completed just 3 of 11 passes for 36 yards in the fourth quarter as the 49ers blew a 10-point lead. Stafford, by contrast, delivered in clutch moments en route to the Rams’ Super Bowl title, showcasing a level of heroism Garoppolo has yet to replicate.
Strategic Implications: A Bridge to the Future
If the Rams move on from Stafford and commit to Garoppolo, the decision would signal a shift toward a transitional phase. Trading Stafford could net a first-round pick or more, depending on his market, which includes teams like the Las Vegas Raiders or the New York Giants who are seeking a veteran upgrade. That draft capital, combined with the Rams’ No. 26 pick in the 2025 NFL Draft, could position them to select a quarterback of the future possibly a late first round pick for Ole Miss’ Jaxson Dart and also add a immediate replacement for Cooper Kupp.
Garoppolo’s role as a bridge would buy time for a rookie to develop, much like Baker Mayfield’s 2022 stint with the Rams revitalized his career before he moved to Tampa Bay. McVay’s track record of elevating quarterbacks—Goff, Mayfield, Wentz—suggests he could maximize Garoppolo’s strengths, leveraging stars like Nacua and Williams to keep the offense humming. However, the Rams’ Super Bowl aspirations might take a backseat during this period, as Garoppolo is unlikely to match Stafford’s ceiling in a championship-caliber offense.
Fan and Analyst Sentiment: A Mixed Reaction
The prospect of Garoppolo replacing Stafford has elicited varied responses. Some analysts, like Alex Porter on X, argue that Garoppolo is underrated and a “phenomenal replacement” given his winning record and fit in McVay’s system. Others see him as a downgrade, citing his injury proneness and lack of Stafford’s arm talent. Rams fans, accustomed to Stafford’s heroics, may balk at the idea of a safer, less dynamic option, especially after tasting Super Bowl success.
Conclusion: A Pragmatic Pivot or a Step Backward?
Jimmy Garoppolo replacing Matthew Stafford as the Los Angeles Rams’ quarterback is a scenario rooted in pragmatism. He offers familiarity, competence, and a low-cost bridge to the future, allowing the Rams to remain competitive while retooling their roster. Yet, the transition would come at the expense of Stafford’s elite playmaking, potentially dimming the team’s immediate Super Bowl prospects. For Sean McVay and general manager Les Snead, the decision hinges on balancing short-term stability with long-term vision—a tightrope act that will define the Rams’ trajectory in 2025 and beyond.
As of February 25, 2025, the quarterback saga remains unresolved, but one thing is clear: whether it’s Stafford or Garoppolo under center, the Rams’ next chapter promises to be a compelling one
About Author
